Skip to content
Daily Vista Trail

Former Second-in-Command Dick Cheney: A Look Back on the Impactful Government Service

The former US VP Dick Cheney, who died at age 84, was regarded as arguably the most powerful incumbents of that position in the nation's history. Whereas countless second-in-commands were limited to peripheral or symbolic roles, Cheney held huge sway during the administration of George W Bush, to such an extent that he was frequently called as the "real president".

Bush resented such a characterisation and stated the relationship was more complex. He noted that Cheney was respectful, consistently addressing him in public settings as the President, while he addressed him as Dick. Bush disputed even characterisations of their partnership as a team because it indicated that they were peers. In spite of such protestations, Cheney viewed the laidback president pliable on a whole raft of governmental choices.

The Post-9/11 Era

At the head of a faction of neo-conservatives that included defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld and assistant defense secretary Paul Wolfowitz, he vigorously promoted the invasion of Iraq in 2003 in answer to the terrorist strikes on New York and Washington. At the time of the 9/11 assault, Bush had been attending a meeting at a elementary school in Florida. Whereas Bush headed for a underground facility in Nebraska, Cheney took command, commanding the destruction of any unresponsive planes nearing the Capitol building.

Cheney stated the attacks transformed him, causing him to be focused on retaliation. In conjunction with other neo-cons, such as Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz, he advocated for a occupation of Afghanistan in an attempt to seize Osama bin Laden. Cheney then pressed fiercely for the invasion of Iraq, although there was insufficient indication of Saddam Hussein being involved.

Disputed Decisions

He showed no remorse about the invasion, in which an estimated 100,000 Iraqis lost their lives, or about the waterboarding of suspects captured after 9/11. He stated to CNN in 2015 that the Iraq invasion, which was founded on inaccurate intelligence repeated by Cheney, was the right decision. "It represented the right thing to do then. I had faith back then and I hold that view now."

However even then, there were dissenting voices at a top tier about the botched execution of Iraq. One of the White House's own delegates to the region, General Anthony Zinni (2001-03), was not reappointed from the position. "I witnessed, at the very least," he wrote later "clear negligence, carelessness, and irresponsibility: potentially, falsehoods, ineptitude, and corruption."

Wider Perspective

Cheney was not entirely responsible for the Iraq campaign. Even before 9/11, Wolfowitz had pushed for similar measures. He had composed a memo detailing situations in which US concerns might be threatened (including "availability of crucial commodities, mainly Persian Gulf oil"). Wolfowitz had contended that "the United States should be positioned to take unilateral action when cooperative measures cannot be arranged," specifically mentioning military moves against Iraq.

Bush too had entered the presidency generally inclined on carrying out what his parent had specifically avoided to do in 1991; overthrow Saddam. Subsequent to he had been sacked by the White House, the treasury secretary Paul O'Neill recounted how, at the initial gathering of the National Security Council in January 2001, Bush had declared his objective of diminishing America's engagement in the regional tensions and suggested defense operations against Iraq.

Bush carried a personal grudge against Saddam, convinced he had been responsible for a scheme to kill his parent, President George HW Bush, on a visit to Kuwait in 1993. He also disliked that one of the most prominent establishments in Baghdad had a ground design with a portrait of his father's countenance that everyone had to step on.

Questioning Techniques

But it was Cheney who was one of the most outspoken behind striking Iraq, frequently quoting agency briefings that were either weak or entirely deceptive. He backed what the Bush administration euphemistically referred to as "advanced techniques", the employment of simulated drowning and harsh treatment.

Addressing a Senate analysis in 2014 that determined that no valuable data had resulted from the interrogation methods, Cheney rejected the findings as "riddled with crap". He informed Fox News: "We requested [the CIA] to implement measures and establish initiatives to catch the individuals who murdered 3,000 of us on 9/11 and make sure it never happened again. That's exactly what they did and they merit a lot of recognition."

Public Image

Cheney enjoyed nicknames given to him by opponents such as the dark character and the dark figure, and by the concept that he was a sinister influence manipulating Bush. In Peter Baker's 2013 volume about the duo, Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House, Cheney is cited as commenting: "Do I represent the evil genius in the background that operates invisibly come out of his hole? It's a nice way to operate, truthfully."

Business Interests

Dispute over his commercial relationships accompanied him during his tenure as VP. Although he had limited background in commerce but established relationships in security, especially in Saudi Arabia, he was asked to become part of Halliburton, one of the world's biggest oil and gas companies, in 1995 as chair and CEO.

In 2000 he assumed the role of Bush's running mate for the executive branch. Debatably, during the Iraq war, Halliburton was given US deals valued at multiple billions.

It greatly increased his wealth. His yearly compensation during his period at the company increased from his previous salary when he was Pentagon chief to $4.4m. When he left in 2000 he had a severance arrangement valued at more than $20m|twenty

About the author

Katie Ortiz

An avid hiker and nature writer with a passion for uncovering hidden trails and sharing sustainable outdoor practices.

Daily Vista Trail

Type to search articles.